In Pennsylvania, Georgia and Everywhere Else, All Politics Is Local


Salena Zito, June 21, 2017


GETTYSBURG, Pa. -- It's a sunny Saturday afternoon, and Richard E. Frey, of neighboring New Oxford, sits alone behind a desk in the cheery office of the Adams County Democratic Party. No big election is coming up, but he is studiously making phone calls to area voters.

Outside, the headquarters front window is plastered with campaign signs of Democrats running for local and national offices, which makes it stand out from neighboring businesses whose merchandise either focuses on the town's heritage, or offers food and lodging for tourists.

Frey is one of the many volunteers who staff the office in two hour-shifts in an effort to rebuild the local Democratic Party, which has decimated in the past eight years.

It's not an easy job, says Marcia Wilson, who chairs the local party. Sometimes her biggest challenge in the process of winning over voters is not Republican elected officials or their supporters but members of her own party.

What is that challenge?

The volume that the progressive activist wing commands within the party, one that pushes being the party of no, the party of protests; and is determined to demand the impeachment of President Trump and fundamentally opposed to the admittance into the party of anyone who is anti-abortion or pro-gun. It spends much of its oxygen consistently mocking anyone who supported Trump.

That might go over well in Manhattan or the Washington Beltway, where there would be no societal consequences for holding those positions.

Yet that kind of rhetoric has large societal consequences here, where the majority of registered Republicans, some Democrats and a healthy number of independents not only voted for Trump but also heavily favored Sen. Pat Toomey, Rep. Scott Perry and every other GOP down-ballot candidate.

Wilson would prefer a message that encourages voters to see why Democrats deserve a renewed chance to govern again, one seat at time.

She said: "I would like to see candidates who support pay equity and healthcare for all, but I would be fine if, in addition to those core values, they were also pro-gun and pro-life. This is Adams County, Pennsylvania. We are a little more pragmatic and a little less strident about who runs for office out here."

In her view, it is the best way Democrats can rebuild their party.

"If the Democrats want to be the majority party again, if we want to be the true stewards of the working-class voter, then we have to build from the ground up, in school board elections and state legislative seats," she said. "And you know what? We also have to start volunteering in communities, be more civic-minded."

And they have to stop running on division and "no," and start running on a message of jobs, keeping the land and air clean and investing in infrastructure, she said.

"We have lost votes because of an overall feeling in the country that we were not going in the right direction," she observed. "That requires us being out there on the front lines and showing who we are and what we do. That's why we are encouraging Democrats to run for all local offices."

Democrats need to get started there, she said: "That's where people learn about you and work with you and realize, just because you have a 'D' behind your name, that doesn't mean you have two heads or that you're a bad person. You show them you are a good worker on the local level."

Wilson is emblematic of interviews with other heartland Democrats in Iowa, Michigan, Wisconsin and Kentucky who feel their biggest challenge to winning back voters is sidestepping the message coming from national Democrats and developing one they believe will help them win again.

So, when Wilson hears Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., dropping the F-bomb to make political points, she is less than pleased. And when she sees how Jon Ossoff, the Democratic candidate in this week's special election in Georgia's 6th Congressional District, nimbly avoids carrying the progressive flag and instead runs a campaign that suits the conservative House district, she is hopeful.

This week, the national media will spend the bulk of its time giving "smart takes" on what the results of that Georgia special election signal about the direction of our politics for the 2018 midterm elections.

The analysis will be breathless, agitated, filled with speculation and vitriol. And, at the end of the day, most of it will be wrong.

Yes, no matter who gets the outcome right, either by accident or by good guesswork, the hard truth is that the national focus will be wrong.

Why? Because nationalizing House races is a fool's errand; if the Democrats win, the focus should not be analyzed as a shot at Donald Trump's popularity. Instead, the focus should be on how a Democrat won a predominantly Republican district and how Democrats can learn from that when trying to win down-ballot races.

What was Ossoff's message? What was his demeanor? How did he discuss Trump? (For the most part, he hasn't.) How did he treat Republican voters? Did he understand the region? Was he genuine?

These are the bread-and-butter questions that Democrats and analysts should look at, not whether he was progressive enough or liberal enough or poked the bear enough.

It is how Democrats won in 2006 and how they could win again -- that is, if the militant wing of the party, which has the microphone right now on social media and in the news, doesn't get in their way.

That is what Wilson is hoping for, as are scores of other county Democratic chairs across the country.

Federal Judge Rules Cross Violates Law and Must Be Removed

Todd Starnes, June 22, 2017

Atheists across the fruited plain are rejoicing after a federal judge declared that a cross erected in a Florida park violated the law and must come down.

I am aware that there is a lot of support in Pensacola to keep the cross as is, and I understand and I understand and respect that point of view,” U.S. District Judge Roger Vinson wrote in his ruling. “But, the law is the law.”

The lawsuit was filed in 2016 by the notorious Freedom From Religion Foundation and the American Humanist Association on behalf of four Pensacola citizens. Click here to view photos of the cross.

The judge pointed out that park has hosted tens of thousands of people for roughly 75 years without causing anyone offense – until now.

When a city park serving all citizens – nonreligious, Jewish, Hindu, Buddhist, Muslim and Christian – contains a towering Latin cross, this sends a message of exclusion to non-Christians, and a corresponding message to Christians that they are favored citizens,” said Annie Gaylor, the organization’s perpetually offended co-founder.

The original cross was erected in 1941 in Bayview Park. It was replaced with a 34-foot, white “Latin Cross” in 1969 by the Pensacola Jaycees.

Judge Vinson noted in his ruling the “Bayview Cross” is “part of the rich history of Pensacola and Bayview Park in particular.”

He said the cross had been the focal point for Memorial Day and Veteran’s Day services – not to mention Easter Sunrise services.

However, after about 75 years, the Bayview Cross can no longer stand as a permanent fixture on city-owned property,” the Reagan-appointed judge ruled.

He directed the city of Pensacola to remove the cross within 30 days. He also ordered the city to pay the aggrieved plaintiffs one dollar in damages. That comes out to a quarter apiece.

The American Humanist Association celebrated the judge’s ruling.

 “We are pleased that the Court struck down this cross as violative of the First Amendment,” attorney Monica Miller said in a statement. “The cross was totally unavoidable to park patrons, and to have citizens foot the bill for such a religion symbol is both unfair and unconstitutional.”

Judge Vinson based his ruling on a court case involving a similar cross that suffered the same fate in Rabun County, Georgia.

If the cross under review in Rabun County violated the First Amendment and had to be removed, the cross here must suffer the same fate,” the judge wrote.

Oddly, Judge Vinson seemed rather reluctant to rule against the cross.

The historical record indicates that the Founding Fathers did not intend for the Establishment Clause to ban crosses and religious symbols from public property,” he wrote. “Indeed, ‘the enlightened patriots who framed our constitution’…would have most likely found this lawsuit absurd. And if I were deciding this case on a blank slate, I would agree and grant the plaintiffs no relief. But, alas, that is not what we have here.”

As I wrote in my book, “The Deplorables Guide to Making America Great Again,” people of faith are facing unrelenting attacks from a ruthless bunch of godless atheists -- hell-bent on eradicating Christianity from the public.

Should Christian citizens be relegated to some sort of second-class citizenship? Should they be directed to keep their beliefs hidden inside the church house?

Will they demand that city leaders rename Los Angeles and San Francisco? Should The Ten Commandments be chiseled off the doors of the Supreme Court? Should references to God be sandblasted from our national monuments?

Just how far do the atheists intend to go in this cultural jihad on our Judeo-Christian values?

Editors Corner

I have followed the elections in South Carolina to fill Mick Mulvaneys seat in Congress as Mr. Mulvaney took a position in President Trumps Administration. The most glaring omission that stood out in this runoff is that the Democrat candidate has gone out of his way to hid the fact that he is a Democrat. Now why is that? None of his TV ads make mention of the Democratic Party. It's a sorry state of affairs that one must hide their true feelings and refuse to acknowledge their political party in order to run for public office. The end result was another defeat for the Democrats in South Carolina and another defeat for the Democarts in Georgia where the Hollywood Left pumped $30 million dollars a ton of money and time in the election only to see the voters not buying their BS.